This ranking system employs bibliometric
methods to analyze and rank the scientific paper performances of the world’s top 800
The selection of the 800 universities for inclusion in this ranking system was based on
obtained from the Essential Science Indicators (ESI). Of more than 4,000 research institutions
listed in ESI, this ranking system first selected the top 900 institutions based on the numbers
published journal articles and numbers of citations. Non-university institutions were then
from the list, and the project staff compared the remaining universities to those included in
ranking programs such as ARWU, THE, QS, and U.S. News. Data used to assess the performances of
universities was drawn from ISI’s ESI and Web of Science Core Collection (WOS), which includes
and SSCI, and Journal Citation Reports (JCR).
The concept of authority control was employed to retrieve data indexed under different forms of
a university’s name in the aforementioned databases – i.e. the official name, the abbreviated
name and other possible forms of the name. This ranking system also considered the merging and
splitting of universities (or different campuses in a university system) and included
publications by university-affiliated institutions such as research centers and university
hospitals. This effort ensured the accuracy of each university’s number of published journal
articles and the subsequent citation statistics.
Some university systems have several campuses. A few campuses within a particular university
system may have been commonly perceived as individual institutions. However, they are indexed in
ESI only by the university system name. For example, the University of Connecticut system
includes a main campus in Storrs and five regional campuses throughout the state. Furthermore,
it also contains the Schools of Medicine and Dental Medicine at UConn Health in Farmington.
These are all indexed under “University of Connecticut” in ESI.
This ranking system corrected this flaw by manually searching SCI/SSCI in order to identify the
actual number of articles and citations of these articles produced by each individual campus.
Likewise, this ranking system employed the same manual searching procedures to ensure that the
measurement of each university’s Highly Cited Papers fairly represented the research performance
of each individual campus.
The reader may notice that the publications counting method for some institutions in ESI
changed this past year, and some universities and their affiliated institutions are now
considered as single institutions where they were previously considered separate institutions.
This led to an increase in the number of published journal articles. Moreover, journal articles
are now indexed by publication year instead of database year. These two changes will affect our